Do soil health indicators predict carbon and nitrogen functional stability under drought and heat?

Abstract

Healthier soils are often assumed to retain function better under climate stress. However, links between common soil health indicators and soil functional resilience to stress are elusive. Our goal was to link soil health status with stress response by quantifying the multifunctional carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) cycling response of soils under different management (forest, conventional, or organic) to drought or combined drought and heat stress. We monitored several C and N cycling functions during a 28-d stress and 28-d recovery period and calculated resistance and resilience indices for each function to create multifunctional C and N cycling indices. We related these indices to baseline soil health properties and microbial community characteristics. Traditional soil health indicators (e.g., total organic C, and microbial biomass and activity) were closely associated with N cycle resilience to drought stress. Indicators that distinguished forest from arable soils (e.g., low pH and chemical fertility, and high porosity, relative abundance of Basidiomycetes, and high C to N ratio) were generally positively related to drought resistance but negatively related to resilience. Bacterial and fungal community diversity were unrelated to either resistance or resilience for either cycle. Adding heat to drought created a strong N cycle stress which affected all sites similarly, and soil baseline properties were not related to either resistance or resilience. For both C and N cycles, stress type was the major determinant of resistance while management was the major determinant of resilience. Our results show that response to drought stress differs depending on the temperature at which it occurs, and that pH, chemical fertility, and SOM are all important components in stress response but affect C and N cycles differently.

Publication information

Originally published in PLOS ONE on 2025-06-06. Original DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325128.

The original full text is available here under CC0 1.0. The displayed publication date is the original publication date.